Granting juridical personality to artificial intelligence
from Corporations wrapping AI
Granting juridical personality to artificial intelligence
This paper provides the following considerations regarding the granting of juridical personality to Artificial Intelligence. First, all artificial intelligence
The reason why the function is not intended to imitate a natural person, but is expected to be a realistic need in the near future, is that it is a transactional function.
It appears to be a legal entity as an investment medium to which legal rights and obligations are attributed in order to limit the liability of the parties involved.
> Second, even in a corporation that operates based on the autonomous decisions of an artificial intelligence, there are no special requirements for its members or officers. Second, even in a legal entity that operates based on the autonomous decisions of an artificial intelligence, there are no particular members or roles.
members do not have to be excluded, for example, by using an existing limited liability company, but they can still be > involved in the management of the company with the authority and
responsibilities can be allocated appropriately. Third, artificial intelligence granted juridical personality by foreign law is Japan
Protecting safety.
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsicr/35/3/35_13/_pdf
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/人工知能に対する法人格の付与 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.